This archive of reports of wildlife surveys in Namibia aims to:
Public access to information is a vital component of ensuring community engagement in prevalent issues. Wildlife surveys are critical to determine the health of wildlife populations and determine trends over time to guide conservation and management actions.
Wildlife surveys are done for different species using methods that are suited to counting them (e.g. by air or road) in their natural habitats. Such surveys need to be repeated over time to detect long-term trends and inform conservation managers. The Namibian government, non-governmental organisations and private reserves all conduct regular surveys covering different parts of Namibia and targeting different species. This archive will thus serve as a repository of our collective knowledge of the trends and status of a variety of species occurring throughout Namibia.
Explore your search results using the filter checkboxes, or amend your search or start a new search.
We counted waterbirds along a fixed route in the panhandle of the Okavango River in Mahango Game Reserve in the dry season during two seven-year periods (1991–1997 and 2000–2006). Palearctic migrants represented by 11 species in 1991–1997 and nine species in 2000–2006 together composed only a small percentage of all birds recorded in both periods. The two most numerous foraging guilds were birds foraging in shallow water and those foraging in deep water. The former guild was more numerous in 2000–2006, while the latter guild was more numerous in 1991–1997.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Waterbirds in the panhandle of the Okavango Delta_2019.pdf | 3.73 MB |
Assessing the numbers and distribution of threatened species is a central challenge in conservation, often made difficult because the species of concern are rare and elusive. For some predators, this may be compounded by their being sparsely distributed over large areas. Such is the case with the cheetah Acinonyx jubatus. The IUCN Red List process solicits comments, is democratic, transparent, widely-used, and has recently assessed the species.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
The distribution and numbers of cheetah in southern Africa_2017.pdf | 6.63 MB |
The Okavango River system, about 480 kms of which constitutes the border between Namibia and Angola, has previously been largely neglected in the annual wetland water-bird counts programme conducted throughout Namibia. The exceptions have been the Mahango Game Reserve and a section of the river at Shamvura Camp where voluntary wetland water-bird counts have however been conducted over a consecutive period of 15 years and 11 years respectively. The remainder of the river had been left uncounted until 2012.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
KOAR Winter July Wetland Water_bird Counts Okavango River 2012.pdf | 259.43 KB |
In 2011, the Ministry of Environment and Tourism conducted a questionnaire to various stakeholders to determine relative abundance of large carnivores throughout Namibia. The results of this questionnaire were quantified and mapped to establish the current range and relative abundance of the six Namibian large carnivores. Recent population estimates for leopards are used here, however, the remaining species we used estimates from the previous Atlas as our best estimates to date.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Namibia Large Carnivore Atlas_2012.pdf | 3.87 MB |
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Mahango bird count January 2002.pdf | 353.37 KB |
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Mahango wetland bird count_January 2001.pdf | 292.11 KB |
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
July wetland bird count_Mahango Game Park.pdf | 400.34 KB |
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
January wetland bird count in the Mahango Game Reserve_Kavango.pdf | 291.82 KB |
Protected and proclaimed areas in the Caprivi, Namibia, hold most of the economically valuable wildlife species in that region. This wildlife is presently being viewed as a potential resource base to support the many community-based conservation and development programmes in the Caprivi.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Research Discussion Paper 9_1995.pdf | 204.4 KB |